When a translation is not accepted, first get the reason in writing, because a rejected translation is rarely a bad translation. Usually the words are right and something around them is wrong: who made it, what it omitted, a name spelling, or its place in the chain. Most fixes are an amendment, not a fresh translation.
"Translation not acceptable" can mean any of the causes below. Each has a different fix, and some fixes cost far less than others. Ask the receiver exactly what is wrong. Ask whether a corrected or supplementary translation would satisfy it, and whether it has a list of acceptable translators.
Then show that written reason to the translator. A translator who can read the rejection can usually tell you within one conversation whether it is a correction or a restart. Without it, you are guessing, and people who guess usually pay for a whole new translation they did not need.
The receiving jurisdiction decides whose translation it accepts. The rules differ sharply by receiver:
A translation missing the translator's details is a variant of the same problem, and it is often easier to fix.
Fix: if only the details are missing, the same translator can usually reissue the translation with a complete certification. If the credential itself is wrong for that receiver, a new translation by an acceptable translator is unavoidable. See NAATI and non-certified translations for what the credential does and does not cover.
A certified translation is expected to translate the whole document, not just its main text. Receivers reject translations that leave out:
A translation labelled as an extract or summary will be refused wherever a full translation was asked for.
Fix: send the translator the full document, both sides of every page, and ask for a complete or supplementary translation covering what was missed. This is normally a correction rather than a restart.
Names from a non-Latin script can be romanised several ways. A translator who has not seen your passport will choose one. If it differs from the passport, the receiver cannot be sure the document relates to you. Dates recorded in a different calendar raise the same problem if the translation does not show the conversion.
Fix: give the translator your passport bio page and ask for the passport spelling, with the original spelling or a note where it differs. For dates, ask for the converted date alongside the original. If the mismatch is between two source documents rather than in the translation, the fix is a declaration, not a retranslation. See name mismatches and apostilles.
If the document was translated before it was apostilled or authenticated, the translation does not cover the apostille, the authentication or the embassy's legalisation. Some receivers want those translated too.
Others require the translation to be attached before legalisation. A translation added afterwards is then not part of what the embassy certified. An apostille, remember, certifies the signature and seal on the document it is attached to, and nothing else.
Fix: ask the receiver for the order it requires. Where only the later certificates are missing, a supplementary translation of those pages may be enough. Where the translation had to be inside the legalised bundle, the chain from that point has to be repeated.
A translation delivered as a separate file, with nothing identifying which document it translates, can be refused. The receiver cannot connect the two. This happens most with bundles of similar documents, such as several certificates, or a transcript and a degree.
Fix: ask the translator to identify the source document in the certification by its title, date, issuing body and any reference number. Where the receiver wants the translation physically attached to the original or a certified copy, a notary can bind them together and witness the translator's declaration.
Some destinations want more than the translator's own certification. They want the translator's signature notarised and, if the chain requires it, apostilled or authenticated by DFAT. A translation that is correct and properly certified still fails if that step is missing.
Fix: the translator signs a declaration before a notary, and it then goes through DFAT. The translation itself stands. The notary certifies the translator's signature and identity, not the accuracy of the translation. If the destination is a Hague Convention member, DFAT adds an apostille; if not, DFAT authenticates it and the embassy legalises it. See NAATI translation with a notary for how the two steps join.
A translation of last year's certificate submitted with this year's reissue does not match the document on file. Nor does a translation made from an uncorrected draft. The receiver compares the two and finds differences.
Fix: translate the exact document you are submitting. If the source has been reissued, the translation must be redone, but only for that document.
| Rejection reason | Restart from |
|---|---|
| Translator details missing | Same translator, reissued certification |
| Credential not recognised | A new, acceptable translator, full retranslation |
| Incomplete translation | Same translator, supplementary translation |
| Names or dates inconsistent | Same translator, corrected translation |
| Wrong point in the sequence | Supplementary translation, or the chain from that step |
| Not tied to the source | Same translator, then the notary if binding is required |
| Needed notarising | The notary, then DFAT; the translation stands |
| Different version of the document | The translator, for that document only |
It helps to be clear about who does which job, because people often ask the wrong person.
A Justice of the Peace can certify a copy of a translation for many Australian uses. A JP certification is not recognised overseas and cannot be apostilled, so it will not fix a rejection by a foreign authority.
Before commissioning the replacement, ask the receiver these questions and keep the answers in writing.
Then give the translator the complete document, both sides of every page, your passport and the receiver's written requirements.
A Brisbane engineer submits his Iranian marriage certificate, with a NAATI translation, to a European consulate for a residence card. It is refused. He asks for the reason in writing, and the consulate says the translation omits the registry stamp on the reverse and has no notarised translator declaration. His translator adds a supplementary page for the stamp. She then signs a declaration before a notary, and DFAT apostilles it. He does not pay for a new translation, because the words were never the problem.
A rejected translation usually has a fixable cause, and five of the seven common causes go back to the same translator. Get the reason in writing, match it to the table, and ask the receiver its rules before the second attempt. A notary adds identity and a witnessed signature, never accuracy. See document translation for how translation fits the wider chain.
Had a translation refused? Send us the rejection and the document, and we will explain each step before you book.
Often, yes. Missing details, omissions, spelling and identification of the source can usually be corrected by the same translator. A new translator is needed only where the receiver does not accept the first one's credential.
No. It satisfies most Australian receivers, including Home Affairs and DFAT, but it does not fix incomplete content or sequencing. Some foreign authorities do not accept NAATI translations at all.
Only if the receiving authority asks for it. Notarisation adds cost and does not make an unsuitable translation acceptable.
No. A notary witnesses the translator's signature, checks identity and can bind the translation to the document. Accuracy is the translator's responsibility, and acceptance is the receiver's decision.
A NAATI-certified or recognised translator, with the translator's name, signature, NAATI seal and practitioner ID, and the date, on every page. Check DFAT's current page before lodging.
Home Affairs accepts overseas translations if each shows the translator's full name, address, telephone number, and qualifications and experience in the language. Translations made in Australia must be by a NAATI-accredited translator.
Usually not. Ask the same translator to use your passport spelling, with the original spelling noted. If two source documents disagree, you may need a declaration rather than a retranslation.
Some receivers want the apostille and any legalisation translated, and some do not. Ask the receiving authority before you start, because the answer changes the order of the steps.
A JP certification is not recognised overseas and cannot be apostilled. For a foreign authority, the translator's declaration is usually witnessed by a notary instead.
Ask the receiver who may translate, whether the declaration must be notarised, whether certificates must be translated, and the order of steps. Give the translator the full document, your passport and those written answers.