Last reviewed: 26 September 2026. Country requirements change. This page is re-checked periodically, and nothing on it replaces confirming the position with the Canadian body that will receive your document.
Canada is one of the few destinations where the answer has changed recently in your favour, and one of the few where the right answer is sometimes "you may not need an apostille at all". Both points are worth understanding before you pay for anything.
Check the current position before acting on this or any other page. Convention membership is a live fact. Confirm Canada's status against the HCCH status table for the Apostille Convention on the day you start.
For a long time Canada was one of the best-known countries outside the Apostille Convention. That produced a great deal of advice about multi-step authentication chains, and much of it is still online.
Canada joined the Convention, and it took effect in January 2024. For documents within the Convention's scope, an apostille issued by DFAT is now the Convention-recognised way to authenticate an Australian public document for use in Canada. If an agent or an older article describes DFAT authentication followed by a step at a Canadian mission, ask whether that advice predates the change.
This is the question that saves the most money, and it is specific to Canada's practice in a way it is not for, say, China.
Much Canadian administrative practice, particularly in immigration, has historically worked from copies of documents rather than authenticated originals. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) publishes its own document instructions for each application type, and those instructions — not general apostille guidance — are what govern an IRCC application.
So before you notarise anything, read the document checklist for your specific application or write to the receiving body and ask:
Bodies that are more likely to want formal authentication include provincial vital statistics offices, courts, land titles offices, professional regulators assessing overseas qualifications, and financial institutions dealing with estates. But the only reliable answer is the receiving body's own.
The chain for a Convention-covered document is short:
Australian public documents issued by government bodies — birth, death and marriage certificates from a state registry, for example — may be able to go to DFAT directly without a notary. Whether DFAT will apostille a particular document as it stands is a DFAT question; check before lodging.
Canada's official languages are English and French. An Australian document in English will usually need no translation for use in most of Canada.
Quebec is the exception to plan around. French is the working language of Quebec's public administration, and Quebec bodies may ask for a French translation of an English-language document. Some Quebec bodies specify that the translation be done by a translator certified in Quebec. If your document is bound for Quebec, ask:
Where a document is in neither English nor French — for example, a foreign document you hold as an Australian resident — IRCC has its own translation requirements. In broad terms it asks for translations by a certified translator, or otherwise accompanied by a sworn statement from the translator, and it does not accept translations done by the applicant or their family. Read the current wording on IRCC's site for your application; the detail matters and it is theirs to define, not ours.
An affidavit from a translator is one place an Australian notary can help: translators can swear or affirm the accuracy of their translation before a notary.
Canada is a federation, and much of what matters here — vital statistics, land titles, courts, professional regulation, the rules on marriage — is provincial. Requirements that apply in Ontario may not apply in British Columbia, and Quebec's civil law system differs again. Do not assume a friend's experience in one province carries over to another.
Do I need to go through the Canadian High Commission? For a document covered by the Convention, legalisation by a Canadian mission should no longer be necessary. If a receiving body tells you otherwise, ask it to confirm in writing, and check whether the document falls outside the Convention's scope.
My document is in English. Do I still need an apostille? Language and authentication are separate questions. English removes the need for translation in most of Canada; it says nothing about whether authentication is required. Ask the receiving body.
How long does it take? It depends on DFAT processing at the time. Do not plan to a figure quoted on a blog, including this one.