Usually, a notary cannot certify a screenshot, printed email or saved PDF as a certified true copy of an original. They may instead view the electronic source directly, record what was displayed, and certify a printout of that observation if the receiving authority accepts it.
A notary certifies a copy by comparing it with an original that the notary has examined. For paper, the original is normally held in front of the notary. A screenshot, printed email or PDF copied to a USB drive has already been created from something else. The notary cannot know whether it was edited before you supplied it.
That is why a notary will usually decline to describe a supplied screenshot as a “true copy of the original”. The notary might instead certify a narrower fact, such as that a printout matches the file presented. Whether that wording is useful depends on the receiving organisation. A certified true copy guide explains the ordinary paper-document process.
The distinction matters because a notary does not certify that a document’s contents are true. The notary may certify a comparison, witness a signature, or administer an oath. The notary must also identify you, consider capacity and possible duress, and may decline an act that cannot be properly completed.
Often, the practical approach is to access the electronic document at its source. You might log in to an email account, bank portal or government account, or open a specified web page while the notary observes. The notary can then record what appeared, where it appeared and when it was viewed.
The source should be opened live rather than supplied as an edited file. Depending on the notary and the receiving body’s instructions, the notary may use their own device, supervise printing, record a web address, note the account or document details, and attach a certificate explaining the process.
The certificate must stay within what the notary actually saw. It may say that a particular email, page or PDF was displayed at a stated time and that the attached printout reflects that display. It does not prove the sender’s identity, the truth of the message, or that the page was never changed by its owner.
Emails, portal downloads and web pages are not identical. The receiving authority may accept one form and reject another. The table below describes common practical approaches, not a guarantee that a particular foreign authority will accept the result.
| Electronic item | Possible approach | What may be recorded |
|---|---|---|
| Screenshot you bring | Usually not accepted as an original | At most, that the printout matches the supplied file |
| Open the account live during the appointment | Displayed sender, recipients, subject, date and time | |
| Portal PDF | Download it live from the issuing portal | That the printout matches the file downloaded then |
| Web page | Visit the stated address while the notary observes | What the page showed at that address and time |
| Chat message | View the message in the account or application | What appeared, not who actually wrote it |
| Digitally signed PDF | Ask the receiving body whether the electronic original is accepted | Depends on the issuer and receiving body |
It proves what the notary did and saw. For example, the certificate may state that the notary viewed a document in a named account or at a stated web address, on a stated date and time, and that the attached printout reflects what was displayed.
This creates a record of an observation by an independent professional. It does not establish that the email was genuinely sent by the person named, that the account holder authored the message, or that the website content was accurate. The court or receiving authority decides the evidence’s weight.
A foreign lawyer may also request technical material, such as email headers or metadata. A notary should only record or attach material that has been specifically requested and actually examined. If the document relates to litigation, obtain written instructions before the appointment and share them with the notary.
Start with the organisation that will receive the document. Ask whether it needs a certified paper copy, a notarial certificate describing an electronic source, the original digital file, or another form of evidence. A notary cannot decide what a foreign court, registry or government department will accept.
You can send the document details through a document submission page before arranging an appointment. Do not send passwords in an ordinary message. Arrange a safe way to access the account with the notary instead.
Only DFAT issues Australian apostilles and authentication certificates. An apostille is a certificate used for a document going to a country covered by the Hague Apostille Convention. Legalisation is the additional authentication process usually involving DFAT and the destination country’s embassy or consulate where an apostille route does not apply.
DFAT accepts only a limited range of electronic documents, assessed when lodged. A scan or printout of a paper document is never an electronic document for this purpose. An electronic document may need the original email or access to the issuing portal.
Do not assume that a notarial certificate solves the DFAT issue. DFAT decides whether the document can be legalised. The receiving country or authority decides whether it needs legalisation at all. Check the current DFAT and Smartraveller guidance before relying on an electronic document.
You may not need a notary if the receiving body accepts the electronic document directly or accepts a copy certified by another authorised person. For Australian Department of Home Affairs matters, a copy certified by an authorised person is usually enough. A Justice of the Peace may also be enough for an Australian purpose.
A JP is a volunteer witness for domestic use. A JP certification is not accepted overseas and cannot be apostilled. Some Australian public documents may be taken directly to DFAT without a notary, but you must confirm the current document requirements with DFAT.
If the recipient only needs to check an online verification code, do not create a notarial copy without asking whether it is wanted. The receiving authority’s written instructions are more useful than a general statement that a document is “notarised”.
The destination controls the acceptance requirements. If the destination participates in the Hague Convention, an apostille may be the relevant certificate, but membership must be checked against the current HCCH status table on the day. If the destination is not covered, DFAT authentication followed by embassy or consulate legalisation may be needed.
Many overseas authorities do not ask for legalised documents at all. Others want a specific notarial wording, an original paper document, a translation or a particular chain of signatures. A notary cannot promise that a certificate will satisfy the foreign recipient.
For a translation, the receiving authority decides whose translation it accepts. DFAT requirements for translations include a NAATI-certified or recognised translator, with the translator’s name, signature, NAATI seal and practitioner identification on every page. You can read about NAATI-certified translation with notarial documents if translation is part of the request.
Bring identification, the device or access method needed to open the source, and the recipient’s written instructions. If you are using an email or portal, check that the relevant account works and that the document can be displayed without editing it. Do not rely only on a screenshot saved earlier.
For a paper copy, bring the original document. A scan, photocopy or earlier printout is not a substitute. For a digital source, tell the notary exactly where it is held and what you need printed or recorded. If the document is for court proceedings, provide the foreign lawyer’s instructions, including any required language, wording, exhibits or technical steps.
A notary may need to refuse or change the proposed act if the source cannot be accessed, the recipient’s requirement is unclear, or the requested certificate would claim more than the notary can establish.
The most common mistake is bringing only a screenshot and asking for a true-copy certificate. Other problems include editing or cropping the source, forgetting account access, failing to ask the recipient what it accepts, and assuming an apostille certifies the document’s contents.
Another mistake is treating a notary as the same as a foreign notary or assuming that every official PDF can be apostilled. Australian notarial practice and foreign acceptance rules are separate questions. Check both before the appointment.
If an electronic document is rejected, ask the receiving authority to identify the missing feature in writing. It may require the issuer’s original, a live verification method, a different notarial statement, translation, DFAT authentication or embassy legalisation. Do not simply obtain another copy with the same wording.
Illustration: You have an email in your account that a foreign organisation wants to see. A screenshot alone may not satisfy its requirement. You first ask whether the organisation accepts a notarial record of the email. If it does, you arrange for the email to be opened from its source, allow the notary to view it, and obtain a certificate describing what was displayed.
The certificate does not prove that the named sender wrote the email or that its claims are accurate. If the organisation instead requires technical email evidence or a particular court exhibit, the foreign lawyer must explain that requirement before the appointment. The example has no deadline or requirement of its own.
The suitable service depends on what the recipient has requested. A notary can discuss a proposed notarial act, but DFAT decides whether it can issue an apostille or authentication certificate, and the destination authority decides whether either certificate is needed. For general document help, see document notarisation in Australia.
If the request involves a power of attorney, declaration or another document with legal effect, ask a solicitor about its validity and wording. Notarisation does not make an invalid document valid, and it does not replace advice about the underlying transaction.
In short: a supplied screenshot, email printout or PDF is usually a copy rather than an original. The safer route is to ask the recipient what it accepts, open the electronic source live where appropriate, and have the notary certify only what was actually observed.
Send us the document details and tell us where it is going, or review the document notarisation service before deciding what to arrange.
Usually not from the screenshot alone. A notary must sight the original, and a screenshot does not establish the complete source or context. The notary may discuss another appropriate act, such as witnessing a declaration about the screenshot, but the receiving authority decides what evidence it accepts.
The notary may need to inspect the original email in the account or system, rather than rely on a screenshot or printed copy. The appropriate act depends on the request: it might involve a copy, an attached declaration or witnessing a signature. Ask the receiving authority what wording it requires.
A PDF may be treated as an electronic document or as a copy, depending on its source and purpose. The notary must sight the original or source material and cannot certify that the PDF’s contents are true. If DFAT legalisation is needed, DFAT assesses electronic documents individually.
A notary cannot certify that a web page is accurate, genuine or permanently available. A printout or capture may be attached to a declaration or other notarial act, but the notary must understand what is being presented and may decline. The receiving court or organisation decides whether it is useful evidence.
No. A notary identifies a person, witnesses signatures, certifies copies when the original is sighted and administers oaths. Those acts do not prove that an email was genuinely sent, that its contents are accurate or that an account was not altered. Technical authenticity may require other evidence or expert advice.
DFAT accepts only a limited range of electronic documents, assessed when lodged. A scan is not treated as an electronic document for this purpose. Only DFAT issues apostilles in Australia, and an apostille certifies the signature and seal, not the document’s contents. Check DFAT’s current requirements first.
Bring identification, the original source where possible, and the receiving authority’s written instructions. For an email or portal record, you may need access to the original account or portal login. Do not rely only on a screenshot. The notary may need to inspect the source before deciding the appropriate act.
Try recovering it from the email provider, account archive, backup or sender, because a notary cannot recreate or verify an original that is unavailable. Ask the receiving authority whether another form of evidence is acceptable. If the matter concerns court evidence, legal rights or a dispute, see a solicitor.
There is no universal answer. The foreign court, registry or other receiving authority decides whether a screenshot, printout, declaration or notarial act is admissible and what authentication is required. Ask that authority before arranging notarisation. It may also require an apostille or authentication, depending on its rules.
Often, no. For documents sent to the Department of Home Affairs, a copy certified by an authorised person is usually enough, and a notary may not be needed. Other Australian organisations set their own requirements. Ask the specific body whether it needs a certified copy, original record or other evidence.